Last week, the developers added a new command to Midjourney — /describe. Here is an in-depth look at what it is, how it works, and what you need it for.

In a nutshell

/describe makes Midjourney "go backward." Instead of the usual text-to-image process, you upload an image, and Midjourney analyzes it and "guesses" the prompt.

We already did a study on a similar tool—CLIP Interrogator 2. It's a free instrument available online and created with a focus on Stable Diffusion prompts. But as the study showed, it also works great with Midjourney. It generates wordy, convoluted, and often nonsensical prompts but the results are stunningly close to the original images.

However, now we have a dedicated instrument—for Midjourney and by Midjourney.

In this study, we compare the two—the built-in designated function and the external tool created for another text-to-image AI.

Quick facts

1

It's super easy to use: type /describe, hit Enter, and upload an image. That results in four prompts in different styles—that Midjourney guessed after analyzing your input. With CLIP Interrogator you go to the Hugging Face page↗︎ and simply drag your image to a designated field.

2

If Midjourney finds an artist's style in the initial picture and adds their name to a prompt, that name becomes a link to Google Search! However, it doesn't do the same (for now) with artistic techniques, art movements, and other style modifiers.

3

Each prompt is linked with a numbered Generate button to quickly send the desired prompt to work. If Remix mode is turned on, Midjourney allows you to adjust the prompt before submitting it.

4

There are no additional parameters available for /describe at the moment. Meanwhile, CLIP Interrogator offers three modes (Best, Classical, and Fast) and the Best Mode Max Flavors setting—the number of keywords and expressions at which the AI will stop analyzing an image—from 2 to 24. For this test, we will use the median value of 12.

5

Midjourney's /describe is blazing fast, taking only a few seconds per image. That's another difference with CLIP Interrogator that needs 25–30 seconds to a couple of minutes, depending on the number of flavors and the input image complexity.

ROUND ONE:
Midjourney Generations

For the first test, I fed Midjourney its own generations to see how it "decodes" itself. The same images went to CLIP Interrogator.

In short, both models "speak the AI language." It naturally doesn't sound human, and in many cases doesn't seem to make sense. But when you "speak" this language back to Midjourney, this happens:

And even when Midjourney or/and CLIP Interrogator "miss", the outcome might be a beautiful artistic discovery! 

Both models are very potent in what they are designed to do, often showing equally fantastic results.

However, if you do it long enough, you notice that CLIP Interrogator's prompts return slightly better, more interesting, and more detailed results—especially with complex source images.

I would say that CLIP Interrogator does a slightly better job in this round. At least with Midjourney generations as source images—that might be pretty unique. How about more well known images? Will /describe and CLIP Interrogator recognize famed visuals?

ROUND TWO:
FAMOUS ARTWORKS

In the next test, I picked several famous works of art—from classical paintings to iconic cinema scenes—and let both models do their magic.

And the very first test brings an interesting observation. CLIP Interrogator recognized the author of the original painting—the great Georgian artist Niko Pirosmani. However, Midjourney's output with CLIP Interrogator's prompt is farther away from the source image. In this case, it's because MJ doesn't know the style of Pirosmani. And thus, /describe's prompt is more faithful to the original image.

Here is a double task: a great architectural chef-d'oeuvre—Pompidou Centre by architects Renzo Piano, Richard Rogers, Peter Rice, Gianfranco Franchini, Su Rogers, and Mike Davies—photographed by the talented photographer Nisian Hughes.

Tim Walker's is one of my favorite photographic styles in Midjourney. Almost as much as I admire his original, real-life style!

What about movies? In case with the iconic scene from Wong Kar-wai's classics, both models delivered beautiful results (both not too close to the original though). And Midjourney even recognized the director!

It's mind-bending what the two are capable of, like in this (challenging) case with a fragment from one of the art history's most famous illustrated books—the Voynich Manuscript.

And here is a more modern classics that generated one the most fabulous CLIP Interrogator (and any other) prompt in this study. Yes, with emoji. :)

And another animation—this time, a legendary anime scene (spoiler: the results are unsettling... ((o____O)) What's that with CLIP Interrogator and animated films??

Trying to decode another classical painting, a heart-breaking masterpiece by August Friedrich Schenck, both models returned results that are stunningly similar to the original—just not in the details (notice though, how both creatures are bizarrely alike). What is stunning, is how both contestants captured the original's tone and atmosphere. Perfect hits.

This rounded showed that both, Midjourney's /describe, and CLIP Interrogator know the classics from very different domains of art. However, knowing the source material and indicating it in the prompts doesn't always mean that Midjourney would returns the results you expect. :)

Round three:
My photographs

For a visual artist, /describe and CLIP Interrogator present a mind-blowing opportunity—to look at their work with an AI's eyes (pun not intended).

Perfect for close-ups, how will our competitors deal with a medium-shot—and a more busy portrait? To test this, here is a self-portrait from lo-o-ong ago.

CLIP Interrogator is closer stylistically. But boy, do I love /describe's interpretation of myself!

Wider shots work well when they are minimalist enough and are not loaded with details and action.

However, more complex photographs can confuse both AIs easily.

Finally, let's see what happens if we include a couple of clearly visible close-ups into an input photograph.

I can't stop being amazed by what Midjourney V5 does with hands now!

Overall, both /describe and CLIP Interrogator deliver great results across every category. And with the V5 Alpha's focus on insane photorealism, I will definitely recommended as a creative exploration (and professional!) tool to not only all my fellow photographers, but all my fellow visual artist out there.

The Possibilities

To conclude this study, I want to quickly go over some of the superpowers that /describe and its counterpart present us with. Or: what can we use them for?
1

LEARNING NEW PROMPTING STRATEGIES AND EXPANDING YOUR MJ VOCABULARY
Midjourney mainly uses words it knows and can visually interpret to describe pictures. So in most cases, if /describe uses a word, an expression, or a style modifier, we can use it in our own prompts.

2

EXPLORING NEW ARTISTS
The same goes for the artists Midjourney "recognizes" (frequently, by mistake :)) in the input images. Every name in an output prompt means (in MOST cases) that MJ knows the artist.

3

REVERSE-ENGINEERING PROMPTS
Midlibrary stands for sharing knowledge—know-how, insights, tips and tricks, and, naturally, prompts—in our studies.

/describe, CLIP Interrogator, and similar tools made reverse-engineering prompts super accessible. It is now easier than ever to learn style modifiers and prompting ideas from any AI-generated image. And my hope is that will somehow make people less secretive about their prompts. ;)

4

FINALLY, IT IS ONE OF THE BEST TOOLS FOR REMIXING YOUR OWN WORKS
For a creator, /describe and CLIP Interrogator are creative goldmines! If you want to see your visual artwork reinterpreted by an AI, look at it from a new perspective, or get inspired by new and unique ways of developing your work further—these instrument are a must-have addition to your toolbox.

And the winner is... *drumroll*

The /describe command (and Image-to-Text AI tools in general) is an absolute gift to a Midjourney artist. It allows you to go deeper, do more, extract new prompting strategies and style modifiers, and learn unexplored artists' names.

As to our (in no way serious) competition: after "feeding" 100+ images to both models, my experience is that CLIP Interrogator does a slightly better job than /describe. It would often decode a bit more, generating more detailed and peculiar prompts.

But in many cases, this difference is marginal. And undoubtedly, /desribe—that has just been introduced—will grow and develop.

Both models work great with simple source material, but often struggle with complex images. And don't even get me started about the prompts they generate. Prompting purist/minimalist in me weeps! >____<

But—magically!—they work! And provide incredible opportunities to any AI artist (and any visual artist, for that matter). So be sure to try those amazing tools out. <3

You can help us maintain and expand Midlibrary and produce more regular educational content of higher quality. And keep it free for all!

Support Midlibrary on Patreon! →

All samples are produced by Midlibrary team using Midjourney AI (if not stated otherwise). Naturally, they are not representative of real artists' works/real-world prototypes.

We'll be grateful for shares and backlinks!

Ver. 2.8.3

Midlibrary by
Midlibrary.
Gerald Brom
Andrei Kovalev's Midlibrary
Suggest a style

Midlibrary Catalog grows largely through the contributions of our Community.
Thank you for taking time to share your suggestion!

THANK YOU!

Your submission has been received. 

We will now test it and add it to Midlibrary Catalog if Midjourney recognizes the suggested style(s).
In case you left your email, we will notify you when it happens!


Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please, check that you filled all fields.
We're here to help! If you're unable to resolve the issue, please, contact us.
Report a bug

We do our best to keep this website running as smoothly as possible.
However, stuff happens. Thank you for letting us know about it!

THANK YOU!

Midlibrary Groundskeeper has been notified about the issue
and—if you left your email—will come back to you ASAP.


Onward to Midlibrary →
Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please, check if you filled all fields.
We're here to help! If you're unable to resolve the issue, please, contact us.
Subscribe to Midlibrary Newsletter

Every week we publish a new Midjourney study and a new Editor's Pick.
Receive our newsletter to never miss an important Midlibrary update!

After you subscribe, you will receive one email weekly. We never share your email with anyone outside our team and infrastructure. Don't worry, after signing up, you can unsubscribe from our newsletter anytime.

Thank you for subscribing!

IMPORTANT

  • Please, make sure to add [email protected] in your mailer White List.
  • If you don't receive a newsletter by Sunday morning: please, check your Spam folder.
Onward to Midlibrary →
Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please, check that you filled all the fields.
We're here to help! If you're unable to resolve the issue, please, contact us.
Rename Collection
Create new Collection
Personal Libraries
are available to our
Patreon Community
Andrei Kovalev's Midlibrary Patreon Community

Check out the benefits of becoming a Midlibrary Patron ↗︎

You have just became a Patron, and cannot log in?
1. Please, allow our Technical Department up to 24 hours to set up your Personal Library.
2. You may be using different emails for your Patreon and Discord accounts. If that is the case, please, send your Discord email to [email protected].
3. If you are still having issue, please, inform us via Bug Report form.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.